A RATIO TO ASSESS THE BEST midfielder European leagues over the past 5 years src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
First of all I recommend reading this post
emergency
Introduction Cost Accounting to understand the rationale and the process followed. I do not want to read that here escape thousands of circumstances or the like.
STANDARDS FOR THE SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT Can you evaluate each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of a midfielder ? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. A midfielder goes to court on 12 plays, of which recovers the ball in 7, and 5 can ignore the player, but the latter, in 3 gets slow progression the attacker with which the plants do their work to your advantage. Of the turnovers, 6 of them have been returned in good condition, and only one of them has led to a rival recuparación. Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 passes given some others will be lost, and that some will be those who do not merit the midfielder and other receptor.
Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% coincide with the full weight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are:
-Player Assists Player
-Goals-Assists
asistidor the maximum of 5 major leagues
-Goals conceded by his team-Point
achieved by
-team Red cards
-ownership of the player
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate time slice to evaluate football careers, as most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4 .
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 7 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions.
not intended here as an exhaustive analysis, but a relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.
THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION call him in Argentina 5, as reminiscent of an era where they were playing with 2 sides and 1 center in Europe was called 6 as the old classification of ridges. Today we talk more specifically as an alternative defensive midfielder midfielder. Tactically
players are easily identifiable, hence the tendency to define it by the numbers: It is the midfield player further back and are positioned just behind the two central and the goalie when the team attacks, and these plus side when the team defends. There is virtually no tactical variant where there is a place reserved for the midfielder, even when playing with double pivot of the two takes a more defensive role than the other. Functionally
are basically defensive players, perhaps more than the goalkeeper. The sides go up the band to join the attack and hanging balls, the center often incorporated with the ball and of course to finish at set pieces, but the midfielder is usually sacrificed in all these moves: He typically, 80% of the shares, the penultimate defensive resource.
Now, we're not talking about a defense, in fact many of them hardly ever venture into the area, moving around the front lime. Despite these duties, they cease to be midfielders, and this means that at times the game will overlook the front counter, to assist in depth or, in the case of the most gifted, to shoot from a distance and a good midfielder becomes great when it is able to add goals to the team without giving up their defensive position. Therefore, one of its essential qualities as a midfielder, is the balance.
credited When a quality midfielder, when its share raises security team defense and sometimes offensive capabilities, when with him on the field the team becomes strong and balanced, the prize is usually permanent ownership. The midfielder is usually one of the most consistent players in the alignments and are rarely replaced. But his tenure involves the commission of multiple offenses, some more punishable than others, with the consequent burden on yellow and red cards. It would however be necessary to distinguish between them. Obviously receive fewer yellow cards is a long-term advantage, because if the player is of quality, the team benefits of competition more regularly. But in a sport like football, so low scoring, exchange yellow and clear scoring chance is not so much the lesser evil as a tactical resource that discretion becomes effective player, especially if those cards are charged as a result of errors made in faraway lands to the area, which do not lead to dangerous set-pieces . When a midfielder misses a game for card accumulation forced the coach to rebuild the team tactically, but it is a low price compared to the 5 goals that have been avoided with these cards. In contrast the red card is a clear injury is look at it. First because it unbalances the team, and may be easier than a goal down with 11 to play much of the game with 10. The red card always comes by surprise, and in a team sport an unexpected change of script can be a disaster. Either way you must consider that midfielder to draw fewer cards that best fulfills its functions.
Therefore the ratio must reflect individual security in their post player, would be expressed directly as the number of starts, and inversely with the number of red cards (turning every 5 yellow in a red) take the precaution arithmetic of adding 1 to the absence of cards do not give a ratio of infinity and to promote that from the first card to penalize the player. The resulting number (which would be greater in the case of undisputed holders that are rarely driven) is relativizaría with 38 games (or 34 leagues of 18 teams) in a competition. The higher this ratio was more constant and effective competition would be the player. But since not enough to compete, as we must also win the individual ratios directly reflect the average of goals conceded by the champion teams of the 5 major leagues over the past 5 years and conversely the goals conceded by the team . The mathematical reason is that very goleados teams this ratio tends to 0 (decreasing the individual ratio), with teams that average goleados in the ratio would be around 1 (holding that individual ratio) and few teams goleados the ratio would be greater than 1 (increasing the individual ratio)
The Ratio Individual (RI), so stay that way.
Contrary to what we estimated in other ratios, here comes not correct in terms of ownership of the player, because his own tenure is an indirect signal quality and any player who fails to take would be relevant to the job.
THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE Individual data give us the image of a functionally defensive midfielder, a player who is present continuously for his team to fit fewer goals than usual. But this being the prerequisite for be considered a quality midfielder, is not enough. No matter how good your paper avoiding actions contrary, this must be framed in a context where the team not just not losing, but needs to win. The way the player has to contribute to that collective success is summarized in two aspects, the balance and integration.
would balance reflected in the percentage of points the team gets and which brings midfielder bit, not only avoiding goals against, but not losing the ball, recovering it frequently, and ready to receive when the attack is congested . A good striker can turn its back on this reality if target goals and a porter will meet 100% your job even though his colleagues do not, but a midfielder is indirectly responsible for overall balance of the game.
The incorporation is measured in the number of goals his team achieved through direct participation. The midfielder is usually the player who enjoys a broader view of the pitch, so if amen to fulfill its primary role as guarantor far from the goal, find the reasons to join the attack and, without losing your position delayed , assist or score, its value as a member of the group rises significantly.
Therefore the ratio must reflect collectively on the one hand, the proportion of points earned by equipment, and this tends to 1 in the highly successful squads. For another, it must reflect the sum of player assists and goals, which in this case relativize the average of the best asistidor, because even the goals do not stop being a collective contribution, rather than an individual trait.
However, unlike other ratios previously developed here do not multiply both sides but that will add to avoid a complete lack of goals and assists the player cancel their contribution to the team. Thus players contributing in attack very particularly successful teams exceed 1 and ideally tend to 2, and beyond.
The Collective Ratio (RC), will read:
the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed each of them to ensure that the overall result is not suffering from overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players' collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant would be:
RG = IR x CR x 100 as a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.
OBJECT MATHEMATICS
While the process we followed produces a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from a certain imbalance due to the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root, or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:
2 ___
RF = \\ / RG
HISTORICAL OBJECT This is the end of the process.
Since this time we have taken the title as a basis to define the constant as a midfielder, the return to take as a value by which to multiply the resulting ratio to give historical significance to the previous estimate. If in addition to being good according to the ratio, you've played a lot in the last five years, no doubt you'll be on the list of the best midfielders in recent years.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
and lack 
