What Is Mississippi River Look Like

, THE PLAYER WHO GAVE A LEAGUE TO BARÇA

; Zlatan Ibrahimovic is a versatile forward, complete and technically unsurpassed, which had been supported by a career in which despite not being a prolific scorer, became the highest scorer ever in a league winning team, either in Holland with Ajax and in Italy with Juventus and Inter. In the summer of 2009 became the most expensive signing in the history of the club. The team that had won everything it was clear the best striker of his evident antipathy story of his coach ("no feeling"). The game credit purchased by a resounding and unquestionable results, Pep gave the authority to do so and the proven quality endorsed by several years competing at the highest level of his replacement, a good move augured a happy ending.

OF THE DAY 1 TO 6, Ibrahimovic breaks in the English league scoring the third of his team's goals in his debut against Sporting. In the 5 days following re-mark on 4 occasions, all of them opening the scoring, including two games that tactically they were greatly complicated the Catalans, as were those of Getafe and Malaga, both from visitors. After 6 games the Swede is one of the top scorers in a league in which the club has over Real Madrid in a difference similar to that after the title will give you 3 points

Week 7 to 11. In the 7 th day Zlatan is absent and the club fails to score a single goal, losing the first 2 points of the season. In his comeback Ibra mark twice in the win at Zaragoza, but following the 3 parties will miss the first 72 min and all the third, resulting in two draws to 1 against Osasuna and Athletic. The continued absence of Ibra result in the loss of 6 points, allowing the Madrid climb to top spot.

OF THE DAY 12 TO 15, Ibrahimovic to score in the 4 games, and twice broke the deadlock: Against Espanyol in a very difficult game, against Real Madrid, a 6-point goal that came just one touch play, but by a distant center Alves.

OF THE DAY 16 to 19, the team loses 2 points against Villarreal in the absence of Messi but chains 3 straight wins.

THE BALANCE OF THE FIRST ROUND is:

-Con Ibrahimovic played 15 games, 14 wins and 1 draw, 43 of 45 possible points (95.5%, the Messi equivalent of 87.5%), 11 goals scored (6 openings marker, 2 seconds, 3 third or later); with him on the field, his team has scored 2.8 goals per game and conceded 0.53.

-Sin Ibrahimovic, 4 games played, 1 win and 3 draws, 6 of 12 points possible (50% of points without Ibra, 77.7% without Messi) in the field without him his team is fitting 0.5 goals per game, but the low scoring average to 1.75.

After a first round where you get a single point less than the previous year, the swap Eto'o for Ibra can be considered successful.

unequivocally positive results in the first round, and given the track record that demonstrates throughout Madrid of the season, it is safe to say that were it not for this fundamental advantage, the League would have ended up in the hands white. The problem is that despite being 5 points ahead in the league, at Camp Barça are obsessed by the loss of collective game, and the low brightness of its leader Xavier, which by now amount only 1 goal and 4 assists " Will Ibrahimovic is so good that he can make his team win without Xavi intervene? HERESY! AGAINST HERESY CULE THOUGHT ONLY! Places to avoid this possibility, re-emphasizes Pep consistently using the formula preferred by your audience and their leader in the field, one that last year gave him the hat trick but this year, had been another game at the Bernabeu (or Pizjuan, or at Cornell), would have been a total failure.

again returns to the emphasis on touch pass to hypnotism insignificant, reduction of space needed up to not show their flaws Xavi What was the consequence? Well, that was the best player on the team, which had guaranteed more points, the one most often had opened the scoring, with whose help he had high goals from his companions, who managed the team good results although not managed to impose his style, was doomed to relocate within the field of play, forced to move in a space so narrow that only benefit ends and second-line players. Pedro and Messi would swell to score goals, Xavi he finally had the pleasure to play, but all at the expense of Ibrahimovic. When you play in front of your opponent, you do not need strikers.

was for the team ... Are you sure?

OF THE DAY 20 TO 26 were the weeks when the Swede began to crumble. The sharp tactical team had the Catalan press began to load the blame on him, "is passive," "constantly falling out of bounds" "Is not involved in the collective game, etc.. His scoring average dropped in these 7 days and scored the only goal against Atletico, and his team noticed he lost 5 of 21 possible points. Missed due to injury against Racing and autoexpulsó against Almeria when his team was losing, why also missed the next meeting. The team's playing style had been cornered and forced from their usual spaces and unstable psyche did the rest, the difference now is that his team could win without him, and that is certainly not needed, constant pressure was enough to end any opened the scoring. Throughout this period most notable was the goal in Stuttgart that saved a disastrous afternoon Guardiola team.

OF THE DAY 27 to 33, some words must be between the Swedish and Santpedor why the technical achievement involved back to the striker, who failed to score in 3 games in a row, 2 of them for open the scoring. Thank you and those 3 victories Blaugrana maintained parity on points with Madrid that seemed intractable despite its irregularity in the game. But just at this moment of Resurrection player soleus injury occurs that keeps you out in 3 games, including the classic. Reappears at the end of the match with Espanyol, which 2 points lost after a great lesson Pochettino tactic.

OF 34 TO 38 DAY Swede turns away and unimportant. His team, which was used to winning without him manage to get past 15 points, and Zlatan disappears alignments up to 3 times. His last goal is marked on the day 34, the third victory against Xerez after his injury.

THE BALANCE OF THE SECOND ROUND is:

-Con Ibrahimovic, 10 matches, 8 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat, 25 of 30 possible points (83.3%), only 5 goals scored, while 3 were opening score. With him on the field his team scores 2.2 goals per game and fits 1.

-Sin Ibrahimovic, 9 matches, 8 wins and 1 draw, 25 of 27 possible points (92.6%). Without him on the field his team scores 3 goals per game and fits 0.44.

In the second round, Messi and Pedro scored 26 goals, Xavi scores 2 goals and 10 assists da ( the other two in particular), the touch and the combination are back and everything seems to go much better, but the difference from the first round is only 1 point, have scored the same number of goals, but they have conceded 4 more. So all these reforms in the game have not had real significance in the results, but instead has cornered the most expensive signing in club history, one of the best players in the world, you may have to leave by the back door . Terrassa With patience and there was necessary to function, that of Malmö has not had the same fate.

THE GLOBAL BALANCE OF SEASON

"With Ibrahimovic, 25 games played, 22 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat, 68 of 75 possible points (90.6%) meaning that would have ended 97.8 points, nearly 2 more than Real Madrid, and therefore LEAGUE CHAMPION, 16 goals scored (average 32.65 50 matches goals and 14 assists), 10 starts marker ( 2 more than Messi in many fewer games). With him on the field his team has scored 2.5 goals per game and conceded 0.77

-Sin Ibrahimovic, 13 games played, 9 wins and 4 draws, 31 of 39 possible points (79.5%) ie it would have earned 85.9 points, 10 less than Real Madrid, and therefore second in the League. Without him on the field his team scores 2.38 goals per game and fits 0.47.

Does he deserve a player of his quality and the numbers on the hand has shown that in its first year has been instrumental in obtaining the League, be shelved for another that is on the decline of his career to enjoy its privileged (and sometimes undeserved) place an idol of FC Barcelona?

I think not.

Business Object Schedule

MESSI NOT THE BEST WITHOUT A LITTLE DISCUSSION OF METHODOLOGY

The criteria for choosing the Golden Ball in recent years tend to differ depending on whether in that year were played at competitions or fail. This is an award that honors not the best seasons, but the best calendar year. Some see this as a severe obstacle to judge more objective and realistic to the athlete whose competitive pace is determined by the season itself. Others, including myself included, believe that the quality of a player must be off-road. If the final leg of Champions League and demonstrated quality and decision, if in the summer with the selection appears as the protagonist and if at the start of the season are showing good numbers, even though the club has changed, there certainly shows the quality player that needs to be considered a candidate.

This year the media has inflated the legend of Messi in months when the player lived your best moment as a player Blaugrana. They spoke repeatedly that it was the best in the world "without discussion" and was looking not only whether it was better or not Maradona, but whether it was the best ever. Were voted on blogs and in newspapers and Rosario used to be victorious. Should be seen after age and football knowledge of the voters, but that's another story.

When Logic is to demonstrate the falsity of an axiom using various methods, one of which is the proof by contradiction or reductio ad absurdum. This is that if that is of a proposition P is necessary to give Q, then, to misrepresent P sufficient to show that Q is not true. If Messi is the best player in the world, has to be better than each and every one of the players in the world, so if you find a better one, will have distorted the initial proposal. And here is where it comes into play Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro (in prepay CR), because if we show that it is better than Lionel Messi (hereafter LM) or that, at least not worse, be challenged for a while, not that the Argentine whether or not the best in the world or of history (both to them), but this axiom is "without discussion." Well, let's discuss.

The first would be roughly assess the achievements of both individual and team. Here there is talk of playing styles, or subjective judgments about the quality of each and whether it brings about the collective. In this blog, always, always, we assume that no player is as good as all the others put together, phrase Barracks genius to understand that when you play 11 against 11 all players show their value in the collective even if it is individualistic. But if you show the consequences, because the demonstrations.

That said, we that CR has played 29 league games (28 starts) and 6 of Champions (5 starts). In the first race had 26 goals and 7 assists and 7 goals in the second. Instead LM has played 35 league games (30 starts), with 34 goals and 10 assists, 11 Champions League games, scoring 8 goals and 3 Cup, scoring 1 goal. What is the result of this first review? The Portuguese government has played 35 games, 33 of them as a starter, scoring 33 goals and 7 assists. The Argentine has played its part 49 games, 44 of them as a starter, reaching 42 goals and 10 assists. It is true that Messi added 9 goals and 3 assists more, but it is clear that the main cause seems to be the difference of matches, taking into account that this difference is not assessable due to technical decisions but a lasting injury is fair to both statistics equal to the lowest common multiple.

What would have happened if CR had played the same games that LM? If we take the convention that alternate every 4 games equals 1 Holder (seldom make change by the minute 60, while Messi has played second complete game of some games he did not leave home), we would that of Rosario 45.25 would have played against 33.5. If supusiésemos that both had played around 50 matches (35 league, 10-12 Champions, some cups, or whatever it is, the number of games headlines to win it all), would have obtained 46.40 LM 11.05 goals and assists, while CR would have earned 49.25 10.45 goals and assists. Almost traced figures that do not prevent Messi might be considered the best in the world, but that question "no discussion."

But hilemos finest. Messi defender best results assert that the Madrid Barça to defend the most critical of the Argentine. The first would be to mention that Castilian as the saying goes, "no can be both ways, what the case means that if the Blaugrana is better than white, that has to benefit more from Rosario, but if what he does best is the contribution it will be necessary demonstrate that it is so and not otherwise. If we unify the season that the club has played 54 games with 40 wins, 10 draws, 4 defeats, 127 goals for, 36 against, while Madrid has played 48 games with 36 wins, 5 draws and 7 losses , with 119 goals for and 48 against, the club has got to be 1 in league, 3rd in Champions, and 5 Cup, while Madrid has been 2nd in the league, 12th in Champions and 28 º in Cup However, the Cup does not serve as a comparison because the Portuguese could not dispute it. We have therefore to stick to the comparison and Champions League.

In Liga, Barca and Madrid was more than just winning, if only because he won the two classics. But in the same way that bigger is more than minor, is also accurately quantify the extent to which this has been, and what we have is that the title was decided at the last day. Could it be that little difference because of the small Barça player? Well rather not. Messi has got 34 goals in the league, but of these 16 have been the third or subsequent goal a game that already was winning, and opened the scoring on 8 occasions. Ie 8 important goals, 10 goals 16 goals important and unimportant. In the case of Madeira with his 26 goals, only 7 of them were to join the party and even opened the scoring 10 times. Or what is the same 10 goals very important, 9 goals and 7 major consequence. There are many factors that may have led the league in Catalonia, but the superior striker Messi has been one of them. What would have happened if both had played 38 games? Well, Messi would have gotten very important goals 9.73, 12.16 and 19.46 goals important goals inconsequential. On the other hand have gotten CR Very important goals 13.45 (3.72 more), important goals 12.11 (0.05 less) and 9.42 unimportant (10.04 less.)

Why not be precise? Suppose the value to 0 points inconsequential, as 1 important (because they help to tie or strengthen party wins) and as 2 the very important (because they break the initial tie and goes from 1 to 3 points). We would then, that CR would have given 7.39 points more than Madrid Messi to Barca, and this, in a league that was decided on the last day and that has become clear that not be in Portuguese, Madrid have lost all options Classic Bernabeu after only mean one thing: that Cristiano Ronaldo has been the best in the league, REGARDLESS OF YOUR TEAM.

Let's go now to the Champions League. In the group stage both teams went through similar difficulties, although Real had at all times less risk of elimination that Barca. At the final 13 points for the former and 11 for the latter. How both players participated in the production of these points? Messi For his contribution was limited to their organization, but merely a marker opening and a playoff. Symbolic or 3 points. In the case of Portugal's contribution was decisive, Bookmark with 3 openings, or about 9 points symbolic. The conclusion drawn is that without Messi Barca would have happened to the knockout, but not CR Real, probably not. In any case, in the group stage was better than Cristiano Ronaldo Messi, REGARDLESS OF YOUR TEAM.

In the knockout stage the club was much higher than Madrid, which could not make the quarter after drawing one match and losing another, while Barcelona made it to the semifinals, winning 4 games , tying one and losing another. What was the contribution of both? Difficult to compare because of the imbalance. Christian failed to get his team spent the quarter, but the only goal in almost 190 minutes of qualifying marked the white set he did.

For Messi, failed to score in the first leg in Stuttgart but opened the scoring in the Nou Camp goal "valuable? To some extent, yes, for breaking the tie is always important, but the truth is that after the 4-0 final was dudodo think a medium of Germany team could hope to do more than fall with honor to the great team of Guardiola. Would it have been the tie without Messi? Probably yes. The tie against Arsenal brought the best time of Barca in the entire competition, which coincided with the great state of form that led many exaggerations Rosario newspaper. In the first leg was held Ibrahimovic scoring that although the Argentine indemnified tetruplete scoring a team that got into the semifinals. His best game this season. Would it have been the tie without Messi? Probably yes, because the outcome of round and classified and can not believe that the Arsenal full of casualties who visited the Nou Camp could have done more than delay the Catalans win, but with the facts in hand, we can not debate otherwise. The semi-final against Inter, was not only the evidence that Guardiola's team is vulnerable to certain tactical approaches, but that more than 3 hours Messi also scored a knockout (and his team did it twice). El Rosario got out with the rest of his team of Champions where he scored 8 goals in 11 games, most of them inconsequential. Can we say with the data in hand, that LM was better than CR in the Champions League? The truth is that, since half of Portugal's matches got almost the same number of goals, to be decisive for the passage to the knockout of his team, and was recently and was more important at the time of the removal of it was the Argentine in the semifinals. No doubt here that the club during the competition was stronger, more decisive and solvent to the white set, and the difference in the journey of both clubs in the Champions League due to the fairness of the game displayed, but they question here than in the knockout stage of Champions, Cristiano Ronaldo was not less than Messi, and the difference in success in both competitions are due to their teams.

After this comparison conclusions are drawn which are self-evident to anyone who reads these lines and is not a prisoner of CULE SINGLE THOUGHT:

1 - that Messi could well be World's best player, but also Christian.

2 - That Messi could well become the best player ever, but also Christian

3 - That if Messi is the best ever and or the world will be for its quality as a player, you have to endorse each game, competition after competition, but that today, May 29, 2010, CAN NOT SAY THAT IT IS "WITHOUT DISCUSSION."