November 2010

A RATIO TO ASSESS THE BEST OFFENSIVE AVERAGE European leagues in the last 5 years

First of all I recommend reading this post

emergency Introduction Cost Accounting

to understand the foundation and the process followed. I do not want to read that here escape thousands of circumstances or the like.

STANDARDS FOR THE SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT

Can you evaluate each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of half offensive? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. An offensive midfielder receives 78 balls and returned in good condition 71 of which 14 were back in line 35 and 22 players who were more advanced. Of these some were lost another player to rush into the move, others because the ball did you get into a disadvantageous position and the rest are controlled by the receiver can begin to rework the play Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 passes given some others will be lost, and that some will be those who do not merit the midfielder and other receptor.

Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% coincide with the heavyweight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).

The list of the data I used to develop standards are:
-Assists Goals from player-player

-Goals-Assists
team of the top 5 leagues asistidor of
largest equipment-Goals the same league champions
-Goals conceded by his team
-points the team

All these data are handled in a time perspective the last 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate time slice to evaluate football careers, as most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4.

Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 7 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that ultimately compensated on a few occasions just to others.
not intended here as an exhaustive analysis, but a relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.

THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
Middle "offensive, driving, organizing? The essential technical and tactical qualities of the players who usually play up the middle, behind the front and ahead of defenses and means of closure, is very diverse. But all have the same functional qualities: Playing for the center (without encroaching on the land of the band players) after the front (either one, two or three, constituting the second line pressure and peak and the first building) and ahead of all features defensive players (goalkeeper, defenders and defensive midfielders, that is, which is the first defensive player whose liability is limited). Here we prefer to call them, in response to functional qualities, offensive means, because it inevitably half-field players and have as main function, improving his team's offensive game.

Each half-offensive is unique. Perhaps it is the field position more difficult to define essential purposes, because there are midfielders whose arrival than most strikers but did not lighten the interplay their teams, some of them are able to organize as a watch the game from their peers but whose dependence on them is so great that alone players become gray, some of them are capable of great physical display and there are to oscillate at any time from one band to another, they are technically very fine and there are only three basic moves dominate with admirable efficiency repeat again and again. But one thing unites them all. Without their help their teams are less offensive, less able to score and sending in games.

Therefore the general quality of a means to improve the offensive attack of their peers. It is therefore important that, for general, be a good player, as complete as possible, capable of passing and receiving without getting tired and making as few errors as possible, although it is preferable to a midfielder suffered an error that has no initiative. That is why if there is a statistic that defines the quality better than nothing intrinsically offensive This is half the attendance figures. It matters little if the midfielder has the ball, controlling it, pass it and receive it without losing it if the move is not complete. Just as the striker is allowed to shoot on goal whenever possible, have a player who does not have to wait any special circumstances to find a pass for a goal, and where he himself comes from the triangulation Pass that long, driving up the area. A good way to be offensive necessarily good asistidor, and it is not enough to be efficient, we must also be effective. When you leave for the effective efficiency is at risk, but football is a low scoring game where they play 11 players and where the prize is so high that the assumption of risks (which are usually reducible by other colleagues) turns out to be decisive for solving games. There are very great midfielders ¾ court for which data are poor attendance: This does not make them bad players, but better players. But a midfielder whose attendance data are high may be permitted the luxury of being imperfect, because if you meet 100% entitled to their function than their peers outweigh its shortcomings. As the data

assists perhaps the most important offensive half not to be alone. What good would a player give a lot of assists at the expense of wasting moves and bad choices continually choose completion? We find a player that would not be efficient or effective, as for more assistance which, like football being a team sport become less valuable if they return their peers put less goals. And it is offensive that the media is perhaps more dependent on the player's successes his team for their individual assessment, and specifically the offensive success that is where they have to focus the individual qualities of offensive midfielder.

Individual Therefore the ratio will include both the ability to get assists as goals from their peers. How do (controlling, risking, driving ...) will be conditioned by their essential qualities, but the important thing is not the process but the result. To relativize both data used in the first case, the average of the maximum asistidor major leagues, so that ratios greater than 1 correspond to real specialists, and in the second half goals from the past champions major leagues, so it will be closer to 1 indicate excellent offensive play of the team and the offensive which the medium is the centerpiece. Most of the calculations are based on averages to 35 games.

The Ratio Individual (RI), so stay that way.

However, the second ratio could inflate the value of an individual player in a special military scorer and not compete for most matches, so it will be must be corrected to avoid falling into overestimates

matches
Cor = ------------------------------
35

Therefore the Individual would thus be Ratio:

It may be objected that the absence of the correction factor in the denominator of the second ratio distorts the calculation for the player to play a few games, but this is due to two reasons. The first is that if you were in both terms would end up affecting attendance data. The second is that this anomaly in the calculation gives more information than it takes in a player whose individual value is referred to the second quotient group rewards for those midfielders that play more games as a starter, but punishes those who are injured. But as the prospect of the study is several years, and since many of the injuries to the offensive half are more structural product entries, and evaluating a player to be centerpiece of a team has to be worse are prone to injury, such objection should not necessarily be decisive.

THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE

Individual data gives us the image of a functionally creative midfielder, has to be one that encourages their peers mess a lot of goals and even more if many of them are due to attendance of its own. But the offensive game as a whole is a sum of various tactical actions whose end goal, rarely reaches. Meanwhile
major player in the generation of this flow is the head of the ball, what you do with it, of what land is placed and from which players will stop. If occasionally he loses there will be other players after him to take charge of it back, but sometimes not achieved and the loss in goal just against. If losses are abundant counter moves will multiply and the law of large numbers says that ultimately an inefficient midfielder played on a computer that fits more goals.

is why contrary to what happens with the other offensive players, which help direct interventions to the whole attack, the offensive midfielder often sacrifice these for the good of all, greater focus on effective actions that lead (in few passes or in a long process, it is relatively unimportant) to develop a scoring play. But it happens that the media offensive has a better image of the game that the rest of his teammates, more focused on meeting their work definition, clear or overflow, and therefore the first to detect bottlenecks in the actions of other players. If these moments have the ball and find the holes
precise, it is necessary that for a moment, and for the sake of the collective game, be individualistic and not resign to take a solo, be it driving or shooting . Under these conditions the half arrivals are powerful offensive weapons tactically to disarm rival and goals are usually achieved and a bonus that increases the effectiveness and efficiency of all times. Therefore, if the qualities usual offensive midfielder, he added the goal, we are facing a complete player who will always be tactically profitable.

But as we said before, no player whose value depends on the success set it therefore be necessary to assess the collective effects the amount of wins, draws and defeats of the team.

The Collective Rato will have to directly assess these goals with which the media contributes to the flow offensive offensive set, but should also assess the goals conceded Conversely, the long symptom of bad decisions when managing ball. The higher the first factor (which will normally be a fraction less than 1 but sometimes could overcome), more decisive and efficient while midfielder may be considered. At the same time this ratio will be affected by the percentage of points earned by the team, so that those midfielders to make the team play well (beyond the technical or design reviews), better collective ratio achieved.

The Collective Ratio (CR) will read:

However, the second element could artificially inflate the collective value of a player in those cases in which the midfielder dispute not a high enough number of matches and military team won or penalize especially when, despite his team play was very little thrashed. To avoid adding a correction factor to the rest of the team goals and winning percentage that would build the desirable 35 games per season:
parties
Cor = --------------
; 35
This correction factor would be inserted and

the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR

When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed for each ensure that the overall result is not suffering from overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of more selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant would be:

RG = IR x CR x 100

As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.

OBJECT
MATHEMATICS
While all the proceedings produced a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from a certain imbalance due to the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have proportional relevance), but the square root, or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this: ____

RF = 2 \\ / RG

HISTORICAL OBJECT

This is the end of the process.
Yes, we took into account the individual and collective qualities of the offensive half to take a number, a single number, as you indicate, play more and play less. We can say This ratio tells us in general, which midfielders are better and which worse, even with some proportionality.
But when we have to choose among the best offensive half a period, not glean until the last corner to find the most valuable, but we choose from among those that we come to mind, say that among the most prominent. And is that history is history, and to be the best in a given period must be during that period, and nothing would work better than using our ratio is not the end result, but as a ratio to apply and what actually has been.
is why when the final list to multiply the ratio final in the amount of assists, goals, games played and victories of his team in the last 5 years but ponder the assists with three times the value that each of the other three factors. Thus players by injuries or other reasons have been less visible in the figures suffer the penalty had not been able to show their quality, giving way to those who in one way or another, ended up acting more consistently and decisively. ANNEX 1

To allow for comparisons over time and after a 100-point scale, defined as maximum reference values \u200b\u200bas follows:

-Assists: 20, being the figure
highest attained by a player in the period 2005-10 in major European leagues
5
co-Goals: 85,
to be the difference between the highest number of goals in that period, 105 and the maximum number of assists.
own
-Goals: 11,
for being the tenth (one for each player on the field) the maximum goals scored by a national champion in that period.

-Goals conceded: 22,
to be the lowest figure achieved by a club in the period and in those leagues.

-% Team Points: 100

-ownership: 35 (or 32)

-Team Victories: 38 (or 34) Taking

references to these figures, the highest possible ratio is: Ratio

Individual: 1.6150
Collective Ratio: 50.0000
Final Ratio: 89.86
Historical Value Reference: 12,940

This can be establish a logarithmic table 100 whose correlation value would be: 12,940
à 2588 à 95 100

1294 à 90 259 à 85