A RATIO TO ASSESS THE BEST END OF AN First of all I recommend reading this post
emergency
Introduction Cost Accounting to understand the rationale and the process followed. I do not want to read that here escape thousands of circumstances or the like
PROVISIONAL LIST OF TOP END (It will be completed with you to add)
STANDARDS FOR THE SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT
Can you evaluate each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of an end? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. One end can send 4 balls in a game area, 2 of which are topped and 2 no. Of the latter one was sent at low altitude, the other was in top condition but no companion went to the auction. Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 balls topped with a cross no fault of the end some and not others, which influences the opposing defense some and not others.
Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% match with full weight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are:
-Assists
Player-Goals
Player-Goals
team
- Assists in the top 5 leagues asistidor the largest
-Goals of equipment the same league champions
-Shooting and shots on goal total player
Shots on goal-scorers of the 5 major leagues
-Goals conceded by his team
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate fraction of time to evaluate football careers, as most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2 sometimes 4.
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 7 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions.
here is not intended as an exhaustive analysis, but a relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.
LA INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
The end is a rara avis. In football, where the defensive effort starts with the center forward position is hardly guaranteed. The end game involves risk and consequently the turnovers. Organized teams with good wingers and midfielders to have the luxury of having a special player that only 1 in 5 plays does something useful for the team but when he does it is usually translated into goals, assists, penalties and even dangerous faults , which also tend to lead to reprimands and expulsions of rivals.
Good endpoint is a player tactically very expensive but is really good just to be decisive. Teams like Sevilla or Atletico not be understood without them, but most teams do not inhabit one or Joaquin Navas. That is why most coaches just confining the ends of that group of 7-8 players that are commonly used operators.
If we were to use a word to define the main function would end the overflows. But overflowing for what? Overflow to drive, to pass and score. Therefore the two most relevant data for an endpoint that price would be, first assists, as no sense to break the defensive line rival if not to give a good pass inside the area, which, when properly given or when it is attempted in profusion, ends up being a goal, and therefore assistance.
But sometimes the end manages to fulfill its primary function without their companions overflowing find room for the auction, at which point the player will be forced to finish the play. It would be important therefore to account for the goals, but the end is not as striker or offensive midfielder when facing the goal as they usually do so from the front, in good shooting positions, when the end is forced to shoot you do as a last resource, often with angles below 45 degrees, sometimes with the leg less skilled as a result of which the effectiveness of face-to-door is necessarily low, being more fair and relevant to consideration of the player count, not so much goals as shots going on goal. Not even the best ends are asked to spend about 5-10 goals a season, numbers that virtually every front and much of the half hitches offensive and often overcome. We will draw, as usual averages 35 games, as it is a very valid number of matches for those players who hold indisputable.
therefore both figures, assists and shots on goal, scoring on our ratio should directly. To relativize both use, in the case of the average attendance of top asistidor major leagues over the past 4 years, so a good tip is to be around or over 1.0 in this ratio, and if of shots on goal, the average shots on goal in the top scorers in recent years in the top leagues, so that good end, he faced on goal as well as a forward, also will be around 1.0 in this ratio.
The Ratio Individual (RI), so stay that way.
THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE
The endpoint is a primarily offensive player. In fact it is one of the 2-4 key pieces for your team or not scoring heavily. Not only directly affects scoring goals and providing assists, but his movements, his uncheck and spend less decisive help ease the errors behind rival that eventually translate into goals are often its own.
therefore a first ratio of this ratio would take into account collective goals that marks the whole team, also adding their own. This roll of goals (since both would be counted in the two figures), would serve to reward those ends that not only help to score goals but even make an extra contribution to the team always needed, because the goal is not the only data on football. To relativize reuse the average of goals scored by the champions of the 5 most powerful league in the last 5 years.
However, the main function of the end is the overflow and their obligation is to try despite the tactical efforts involved for the rest of the team his turnovers, does not mean that we should not infer the influence of these losses on the results of the matches. You can lose the ball in many ways, you can lose far or near the goal, you can go one on himself after the loss and harass recovered to make it easier defensive teammates, even recovering the ball yourself . Login to review all such losses would bear costs of dubious value the information you recover. We therefore propose to measure directly the number of shots the player and vice versa the number of goals conceded by his team. Ultimately, the end to lose many balls fire less often and cause dangerous situations in which they fit goals. Eventually the good end will bring forward their dribbles to fire many times and if you lose a few balls or in case of loss contributes defensively, his team will fit together less goals.
The Collective Ratio (CR) will read:
However, the second ratio could artificially inflate the collective value of a player in those cases in the end does not dispute that a sufficiently high number of parties and military equipment or penalize particular scorer despite playing when his team was very little thrashed. To avoid adding a correction factor to the goals of the rest of the team staff who will take the basis of the desirable 35 games per season:
; Matches
Cor = --------------
35x5
This correction factor would be inserted and
the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR
When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed each of them to ensure that the overall result is not suffering from overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant would be:
RG = IR x CR x 100
As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.
OBJECT MATHEMATICS
While the process continued to produce a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from some imbalance because the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:
HISTORICAL OBJECT
This is the end of process.
Yes, we took into account the individual and collective qualities of the ends to make a figure, a single number, as you indicate, play more and play less. We can say that this ratio tells us in general, which forwards are better and which worse, even with some proportionality.
But when we have to choose among the best ends in a given period, not fetched until the last corner to find the most valuable, but we choose from among those that we come to mind, say that among the prominent. And is that history is history, and to be the best in a given period must be during that period, and nothing would work better than using our ratio is not the end result, but as a ratio to apply and what actually has been.
is why when the final list to multiply the final ratio by half to two between goals and assists and shooting to door in the last 4 years, although the assists weigh twice as much value to the shots and goals, as these last sides of the same coin. Thus players by injuries or other reasons have been less visible in the figures suffer the penalty had not been able to show their quality, giving way to those who in one way or another, ended up acting more consistently and decisively.
CASE STUDIES
(The figures relate, for reasons of sources, the last 4 years)
JESUS \u200b\u200bNAVAS
8.6 22.4 RI= ------ x ------ = 0.2446 13.6 57.9
(64.5 x 0,90) + 3.6 64.7
RC= ------------------------- x ------------ = 1.4799
77.4 x 0.90 43 x 0.90
RG= 0.2446 x .1.4799 x 100 = 36.20
RF= 6.02
AARON LENNON
9.3 22.9
RI= ------ x ------ = 0.2705
13.6 57.9
(58.8 x 0.70) + 4.6 41.4
RC= --------------------- x ---------------------- = 0.9941
77.4 x 0.70 50.25 x 0.70
RG= 0.2705 x 0.9941 x 100 = 26.89
RF= 5.19
FLORENT MALOUDA
8.1 30.9
RI= ----- x ------ = 0.3179
13.6 57.9
(75 x 0.71) + 10.5 92.6
RC= ------------------- x ------------ = 5.83
77.4 x 0.71 27.2 x 0.71
RG= 0.3179 x 5.8278 x 100 = 185.27
RF= 13.6
GARETH BALE
5.7 26.4
RI=-------- x -------- = 0.1911
13.6 57.9
36.1 + 4.4 83.9
RC= ------------- x ------- = 2.7035
44.1 28.5
RG = 0.1911 x 2.7035 x 100 = 51.7
RF = 7.2
ANGEL DI MARIA
RI 05.05 10.01
=----- X ----- = 0.0705
13.6 57.9
18.9 + 5.5 23.5
RC=------------- X -------- = 2.9642
24.8 7.8
RG= 100 X 0.0705 X 2.9642 = 20.89
RF= 4.57
JOAQUIN SANCHEZ
5.8 15.1 RI= ------ x --------- = 0.1112
13.6 57.9
(58 x 0,73) + 4.8 35.7
RC = x ---------------------- --------------- = 0.8251
, 77.4 x 49.5 x 0.73 0.73
RG = 0.1112 x 0.8251 x 100 = 9.17 RF = 3.0
Mauro Camoranesi
RI = 0.1921 RC = 1.3007
RG = RF = 5.0 25.0
Santi Cazorla
RI = 0.1571 RC = 2.9190
RG = RF = 6.8 45.86
ASHLEY YOUNG
RI = 0.2982 RC = 1.4050
RF RG = 41.9
= 6.5
ADAM
Johnson 0-0967
RI = 1.4366
RG = RG = RF = 3.7 13.89
NANI
RI = 0.2301 RC = 3.2957
RG = 75.83 RF = 8.7
Before a packed auditorium and excited or the Dr. Michio Kaku has tried to unite the real and the fantastic in just 45 minutes. A conference on what life will be within just a couple of decades, running the day to day any pers ona. Augmented reality, nanotechnology and total connection, sufficient to carry out the digital revolution.
In 10 or 20 years, had Professor Kaku, the lenses of eyeglasses or contact lenses serve as screens to complete the real-world information transmitted. A tourist can travel to Rome and see the legions fighting or old buildings. On the other hand, serve as a supplement to personal information, whether for real-time captioning for people who speak another language or to remember, using facial recognition , how and when to know the person you are saluting and not located exactly. Not to mention the huge number of military applications, such as for airline pilots, who can actually see 360 \u200b\u200bdegrees.
but go beyond, through interaction, talking to the wall will to say "mirror, mirror magic," and fulfill the desire of the user. The converted paper display will be as cheap as a current sheet. Doctor becomes quick reference, the secretary to see the agenda and also in video player that can be asked, as I said the physical, instead of Humphrey Bogart Casablanca's protagonist is self.
On the street, one of the tasks will be easier in the future as Kaku is buying. The stored information will move from mass production to customized production to increase the degree of satisfaction. For example, someone will come to a store and see a model you like and fits fairly well in according to their size. But that will not be an obstacle because, to pay, tell credit card to the factory that produces the model with a specific measures for his client.
From the medical point of view, for example, the toilet will be able to analyze the urine every day to recommend a diet, toothbrush appointment at the dentist if it detects a cavity, the clothes will know How is body temperature or if there is a functional failure and notify emergency if necessary.
