PARTY CONCEPT OF ARGUMENT
Each and every one of the sports that we know meet similarities and differences compared to others. In some there is a single score (football, handball, volleyball), in others there are different types of scoring (basketball, rugby). In some absolute scoring (basketball, handball, soccer), is subject to other sets (volleyball, tennis). But there's always something in every sport that makes it special from the rest: The rugby ball, the basket in basketball, tennis racket ...
Football is a sport very immediate, very easy to understand at first instance: 20 guys behind the ball without being able to play with 2 hands and porters, and party resolution mechanism, the goal is of simplicity this is no surprise that it is the world's most popular sport. And it's funny because in football, there are few elements that are unique, goals, areas, ball, rules, all this keeps enough relative to other sports, including the goal.
What makes football so special, that makes it truly different? There is almost no doubt about it: The low score.
In a game of rugby, basketball, handball, let alone in tennis, the box is in constant motion. Not so in football, where a large part of the meeting has ended without a single goal and where half of the wins are produced by a single goal difference. The football is boring for those who do not follow it regularly, for anyone who has not crossed the barrier mandatory minimums want to understand strategic and tactical knowledge. But even a good amateur who see a goalless draw between two teams that already know it, those two hours can be from a doze unimaginable. And yet, when one of those two teams whose players know, scores a goal, you can see the gestures of joy, the shocked faces of the fans fortunate, as if those little seconds of ecstasy and smack back, justifying the more tedious waiting.
In all matches in all sports There is an "argument" of that party. The teams leave the field with different expectations and sporting situations, each with some strong and some weak points, and depending on how they will produce the score should be tactical decisions, running more or less risk, clenching or lower arms. All this comes at a match in any sport, except for the split in sets, where the absence of clock, there is hope of victory as the party continues.
How does this notion of argument in a sport where the clock run without stopping, which only allowed 3 changes and where the score is usually low? We can say that affecting the same, only more so, because in the beautiful game almost everything that makes a difference turns out to be more definitive, because such a low score.
not play with the same anxiety the equipment you need to score in 14 minutes in the 82, not so hard the team loses 3-0 to break that which is still unbeaten at the edge of 90 minutes, no As the team sacrificed the middle of the table against a far superior rival in that area not to his own fans and against a direct rival, not a team defensively so tight that you have a player sent off on 25 minutes than does the 11 on grass. Not to mention if there are several conditions at once.
There leagues more balanced and less balanced, that is the case a few years championships are most competitive than others, and in all countries live in any year or period of years, a situation in which one or more computers show a remarkable superiority over the rest. Has been the case with the big 4 in England where the five years 2005-2010, has been the case with Inter. or Olympique Lyon in their respective leagues, it is traditional in countries like Scotland or Portugal, and is happening now in Spain with Barcelona and Madrid.
All I perceive very immediate way: The most teams they face in Madrid and, above all, to Barca, leaving the pitch to try to surprise. As the minutes go by mutating to resist the argument as long as possible with clean sheets. After the first goal still maintain hope of a counter to equal the score and even that is the case that the opponent comes forward and seeks to maintain either that meager difference or start a valuable draw. But it often happens that the first time since the big team is winning by two goals, and although the potential of a tightening goalscoring that the development of the game, you can bet with little risk of losing the three points are for the most powerful team.
GOALS USELESS
argument is precisely this notion of party brings as a corollary the concept of futile goal. What competitive sense is the third, fourth, the fifth goal in a game where the strongest team gives few options to rival? Practically zero.
The 1-0 is very important because it breaks the initial tie-ipso facto provides the ability to add 3 points to 0 and leave the opponent. The second goal allows the team play much more relaxed, knowing that if they fit a therefore be polished without mistakes cost points that have allowed this goal and continue to dominate the meeting. They are likewise important third, fourth or subsequent goals if the goal has not kept clean sheets, so that extra goal can reduce benefits, to attain the tie break for or put distance in between.
But again, when the difference reaches 3 goals see, because experience teaches us so, that 95% of cases the team that eventually reaches the edge, more or less effort taking the 3 points. And that percentage, if the difference is in favor of more powerful computer, you can get to reach almost 100%. Few people remember that a clearly superior team to another missed a three-goal lead.
all know this. He knows the strong team that reaches the difference and can make changes that allow players to play less common whose hunger and need to demonstrate conditions can gain the win. He knows the small team who have pending next match against a direct rival, will do nothing other than maintain a minimum dignity in the countryside and escape from actions that could involve sanctions that ultimately could be decisive. It is familiar to fans of the first club, after a certain time relax and forget about the possibility of suffering, in any case, if in the field, you may go early to avoid traffic. We also know the second, which digest the suffering and change it by indifference. And we know everyone else except to see spectacular individual actions we may change the channel or we get up off the couch.
All this falls within what is usual in any championship in any sport in any country: There are games in which the argument is broken and no longer have interest. Whether winning by 2-0 or 6-1, the winning team takes the 3 points and the loser will go home empty.
However there is a statistically highly distortionary side effects: Statistics individual players. Score the first goal and the second has a great tactical value. Put the third or fourth in a meeting where goals are having exchange can be vital. But drilling of goal for the fifth time while itself is undefeated just the slightest lack of competitive significance, much less well if it does this is the most powerful of the two teams. The same is true of other individual statistics as assists.
And yet, the media or the public, is just echoing these individual figures, which sometimes beat records, but that deep down we all know, because we remember the unbalanced argument of those games where the opponent failed to compete at 100% (or at least 100% in hopes of scoring), but figures are not inflated for several minutes inconsequential.
So Far: REAL MADRID AND BARCELONA MESSI CRISTIANO RONALDO AND
The English fans waiting to attend a match scorer in both the winner and the loser may end up above the current record of 38 goals in the hands of Hugo Sanchez, and which seem to have already booked for both the gold and silver boots for the 2010-2011 season.
Day after day the two players are added goals. When one of the two strings together several games without scoring more than the other or away or put through for a few days, until the rival chains a run of several parties or make a triple mark, when he again approached to each other, even staying even. Skip
30 or 35 goals in a season has a huge merit because although we know that many of these goals are useless, eventually reaching these figures mean providing many points for the team. On the other hand is not the same conduct these adjusted figures scorers in that league championships as the current (And even above) where there is an imbalance between the two most powerful clubs and the rest.
What if, taking into account the arguments of the party, we did not have all these goals in mind useless? All those many who have crushed again and again to a rival that was already defeated and that obviously do not have the same merit as those noted when the argument of the party is alive and still points at stake, and the opponents are 100% effort to avoid ...
We recognized the goals made by both teams until the day 26, and the amount of total goals, we have deducted the third or subsequent goals scored when the goal itself was a 0, the fourth or later when he was 1, the fifth and later when he was 2, and so on. It is assumed that those who increase their lead more than 2 goals.
We have also prepared a list of the top "scorers useful" for both teams, to discern how much of merit are those extraordinary figures scorers and how much inflation is on them.
What we see is very enlightening and suggests a number of conclusions:
"If extrapolásemos data accumulated over more than two thirds of the championship at the end of it, to week 38, that Barcelona will be around 112-113 goals per 90 - 91 of Real Madrid. But Catalans 37-38 goals and 26-27 meringues, will have no influence on the distribution of points.
-CR and Messi both, exceed the 39 goals, but of which only 26 have competitive value. That is, if not in receipt of playing in a league so unbalanced, their records would be around 30 goals, a remarkable figure, but not much the 25 Van Nistelrooy in a league where the first two were tied on points, the third was a 5 and the fourth at 10, 26, Eto'o or a year from 2 nd to 6 th mediated only 6 points.
-Villa, which is likely to reach 25 goals there will be a decisive contribution to his team over 14.
Peter, whose average points to 19 goals will not help his team points with 10.
-The percentage of contribution to the goals of their team Messi remains constant at 35% already taken into account total goals or useful.
For his companions, Villa will increase from 22 to 19% and Pedro from 17 to 13%.
"In the case of C. Ronaldo the individual contribution remains the most critical, with 44% of the total goals and 41% of useful goals.
recapitulate, we can say that the current imbalance between the two major league clubs and the rest will eventually push up the score 60-65 goals a useless, almost as much as those pursuers will get his most effective.
Regarding the spectacular figures scorers Messi and C. Ronaldo, we must add that if a player useless sumase all the goals that both end up scoring at the end of the league, this hypothetical player would be able to wrest the trophy scorer both.
0 comments:
Post a Comment