src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
FACTS AND BACKGROUND TO CONSIDER
1 -. Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, prime minister since 2004, is fond of FC Barcelona.
2 -. José María Roures, owner of Mediapro and La Sexta, is fond culé.
3 -. After more than 15 years with three national television awards in Spain, Zapatero granted in 2005 a new grant to The Sixth
4 -. In 2006 Mediapro start preparing an elegiac documentary about Zapatero for which hired as a sports presenter who accompanied him on trips and meetings: Josep Guardiola.
5 -. In June 2006 double Mediapro television rights until that time, the FC Barcelona Sogecable charged
Five months later, Real Madrid also signed a similar contract Mediapro. Http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2006/11/20/comunicacion/1164024250.html
6 - During the 2006-2009 season saw the "Soccer War" on that Mediapro opted to pass in open many parties that were offered in the form of pay per view by its competitor Sogecable. In June 2010 the courts ruled it the right to charge for those 105 million euros for the violation of rights.
7. Mediapro, whose net worth is more than 30 times less than the amount of such rights on the teams in La Liga, obtained the necessary funds through loans mainly by La Caixa, Banco Popular, Banco Sabadell and the Institute of Government funding Generalitat de Catalunya, all based in Barcelona and, most presumably, a clear majority culé in their boards. Today that debt is extended until 2013 as a result of the group's losses
8 -. In such broadcasting rights contracts, Real Madrid and Barcelona earn the same amount, and triple and quadruple revenue over the following teams with more revenue.
However, although the city is being the best time of their sporting history, social and economic audience data do not reflect this parity with Real Madrid, and this proportion to other clubs.
Some recent examples:
-Arsenal-Barcelona, \u200b\u200bChampions League second round first leg in open play as a visitor: 6,663,000 viewers.
-Olympique Lyonnais, Real Madrid, also knockout round of Champions, also open, also playing as a visitor: 8,278,000 viewers
-Barcelona-Athletic de Bilbao, Cup final, in stark: 10,012,000 viewers
-Sevilla-Atletico Madrid Cup final, in stark: 8,307,000 viewers
9 -. At the end of the 2008-2009 season debt quadrupled English football clubs and television revenues more than doubled total revenue
THE WEIGHT OF TELEVISION RIGHTS
(Source Deloitte.com)
Here is a list of clubs with more money in Europe:
striking that lead Real Madrid, despite not living its best sporting terms, but is understandable given that the club has always been the most followers in Spain and one of the favorite destinations of the main stars of football.
was followed by Barcelona, \u200b\u200bManchester United, Bayern Munich, Arsenal, Chelsea, Milan, Liverpool, Inter ... all great teams swollen in recent years have been successful sports, except perhaps for the Gunners.
The rest, down the list, make it popular monitoring equipment recognized in the past year have met their expectations competitive.
But let the breakdown of these revenues.
Here is a list of clubs that are most box office receipts. Includes both ticket sales and season tickets and membership cards.
The order of classification points out the importance of those most traditional clubs, those that bring together millions of fans in large stadiums are often full despite the high price of tickets and passes. Curiously, the Barcelona, \u200b\u200bwhich has the largest club stadium in Europe, is fourth. And that the best time in sports history.
On with business income. Here are included, not just revenue from jerseys and sports equipment to teach the club, but sponsorship and promotional contracts.
In this table are a combination of those clubs that have a strong brand image with those with a large number of supporters in several countries and those with numerous hobbies and faithful they spend much of their income to dress in the colors of your favorite team.
The list felt the highest level of per capita income of countries like Germany.
Finally television rights. This includes both contracts with owners of the rights to national leagues as income derived from participation in UEFA competitions.
What we see here a lot of attention.
Topping the list the two English teams, followed by three Italians, four English and then in tenth place at the same level as in the other two lists are medium equipment such as Celtic and Borussia, is the FC Bayern München, long the club with more fans in Germany.
Germany exceeds the population of Spain by 85%, that of England in more than 60% and those of France and Italy around 50%.
The per capita income in Germany is clearly superior to the other countries mentioned and in the case of Spain, much higher.
The Deutsche Fussball-Bund is the umbrella over all FIFA members with 26,000 clubs and over 6 million federal, and six of its clubs are in the Top-15 in stadium attendance.
Barca say is "the army without weapons of Catalonia" but the FCB München carries its name from its region (Bayern is Bavaria), which nearly doubled in population in the English region.
Despite these factors, and although the sports season Munich picture was better, what we find is that the half joined Bayern for broadcasting rights to the Barcelona.
What is the reason for this difference? Could it be that the Catalan club generated an unusual interest beyond the Pyrenees as to justify such a difference?
Before continuing, let's television deals in some leagues, including German and English:
Here's why: Real Madrid and Barcelona admitted five times in the domestic championship to Bayern dominated the Bundesliga in recent decades, and almost three times than any team in Europe.
Is it justified that when Spain, in population, income and number of federal fails to Germany and although the revenue figures in other sections do not show any precedence?
Viewing the data presented so far appears to us that this logical conclusion: The Real Madrid would enter less for the TV rights to enter and Barcelona alone.
THE DESTINATION OF THE SINISTER INEFFICIENCY
Leave aside the political sympathies string football that led to this situation and focus on observing what happened when making decision the concept of efficiency has been lacking.
Italy, where for years it has distributed Mediaset most revenue among the Big Three broadcast (Inter, Milan and Juventus), has spent the 4 th place in the UEFA rankings and lose a Champions League place for Germany, curiously the country that, despite being richer and populated, less money entering the clubs.
years ago broke the old television model and since then their clubs are among the healthiest in Europe. It is not the case of calcium, or its main squadra, that although revenues quadrupled most powerful club in the Bundesliga accumulate hefty losses.
England, the country where over charged and shared rights is also the largest total debts accumulating, although proportionately smaller scale than in Spain.
and return to Spain. Despite the great economic advantage the two accumulating large debts that, in the case of annual revenues equal Madrid and Barcelona where over 60%, and growing, because a quarter of that debt are the losses in the last year despite winning the League and reached the semifinals of Champions (in both cases the highest objectives in their balance sheets). This situation has led him to hire, for the first time ever, a sponsor for the shirt.
On a sporting level, we see that with the exception of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bthe great beneficiary of all this framework, the English teams fail in the continental showpiece, with Madrid second round that does not happen in 6 years with Valencia or Sevilla that does not progress beyond the first round (the latter even falling in the agreement) or an athlete that even surpasses the group stage.
seems that, as has happened in the Calcio, the lack of international competitiveness is decreasing the competitive muscle of English clubs in Europe. The inefficiency is paid.
The next three years show a disturbing forecast:
"It is expected that the English economy to grow above 3% throughout this period and is almost certain that the final figure unemployed continue exceeding 3 million, and may still closer to 4 than 3. From which it follows that domestic demand in general and the television market in particular, hardly grow.
-declared English debt continues to grow with annual budget deficits well above 3% (2009 11.4% 2010 9.8%) This will allow the interests of sovereign debt has more and more weight on public expenditure, so that put a halt to a rapid reduction of the deficit and the longer-term entrenchment of that debt. Also in the coming months bring out all that debt of local and regional administrations that had makeup through the balance sheets of public enterprises and which differed payments to suppliers.
-The entire English financial system is in a precarious situation due mainly to accounting overvaluation of real estate not sold or performed since most of their liquidity is being used to acquire English sovereign debt, which guarantees profit margins lower than other financial flows. Also, the plight of the family's private debt yields little hope for the future.
"Most of the savings and many of the banks are technically bankrupt. Evita's collapse FROB punctual assistance to certain entities, but the rescue of all those with poor prospects will lead to public coffers between 50,000-150,000 million euros, of which 11,000 have already been produced and the government has already recognized as estimable no less than 20,000.
-Mediapro, accumulating losses year after year after having been priced out of the market with the rights of the English League, defers its debt until 2013, when the pay at one time. By then, the very Mediapro be added more losses and may even be broken and some of the creditor banks may already have been rescued with public money.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
going to be very difficult in an environment so negative all clubs receive the income they have agreed, so it is very likely that the rescue of these financial institutions can happen, the bankruptcy of concessionaires image rights (as happened years ago in Germany) and then some SAD. Maybe one club to be converted in SAD.
retraced my steps to the chain of events, we can say that the English pay taxes in the future the cost of bailing out some financial institutions have inefficiently debt forgiven in a society that in its inefficient decisions, has purchased for more money for its value the rights of a football club whose box office receipts, which trade sales and audience figures which are not justified economically. The prime minister, most directors of public and private financial institutions involved and the owner of the producer, are all fans of that club.
0 comments:
Post a Comment