Can assess each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of a midfielder? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is why. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. A midfield as well go to court and retrieves balls that enters the building and attack. When you perform defensive tasks will be conditioned by the presence of his midfield, the capacity up and down the sides .... When offensive performs strongly depend on the degree of pressure from rival, creative capacity and extreme mediofensivos. If the team plays with two creative media and false ends its participation may be more discreet and more decisive change if you play with only one offensive midfielder and two open ends, the loss of their colleagues must force him to come into play, either to retrieve the ball to restart the attack, and this in turn can make playing short drive to the front, if played in short will be valuable averages of passes, if it leads to the front will have to assess the ability to keep balls in line ¾.... Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 passes given some others will be lost, and that some will be those who do not merit the midfielder and other receptor, and that for every 10 losses ¾ turnovers in only a proportion will be dangerous for the team, the rest being rinsed by a combination of defensive patterns.
Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% coincide with the full weight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens other elements have their weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are
player
-Assists-Goals
Player-Goals conceded by his team-
Goals scored by his team-Point
achieved by the team-ownership
player
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate time slice to evaluate football careers, for most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4.
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 7 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions. It is not intended
here as an exhaustive analysis, but a relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.
THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
todocampista
Why? As simple as that because the whole field is concerned. You must get into the area itself if the occasion arises, to visit the area if you find the time rival, the lime must know both bands at some time during the game and not let an inch without stepping on or around the middle. In a multi-party perspective, our players can be ranked as a midfielder with a double pivot llegador very Defensive back, may be part of a double pivot offensive versatile, but also the defensive, you can be part of a trivote, either in the center or more glued to the band and will be games where exercising end of a defensive midfielder. The fans, when talking about it, discuss their true position, some will see it as an attacking midfielder who learned to perform tasks of containment, others see it as a midfielder who happens to own arrival and went ahead in their game leaving work specialized defensive midfielders ... Think of Yaya Toure in Xabi Alonso, Gareth Barry, in Bastian Schweinsteger ...
The fundamental quality, almost the only one todocampista is balance, but a superlative balance. Front ends, or mediofensivos hitches have a limited defensive responsibilities, central, lateral or central midfielders provide better when in attack but their primary obligation is to defend. The todocampista is the player of the field whose duties are more consistent, 90% of the time your competition is needed so that things go well, almost never be disqualified from the rally, because love to have the largest share of custody field also has the largest computer game perspective. If the end is at the corner flag trying to fool the defender contrary, the todocampista should begin to position themselves to recover a fumble as possible, if the lateral or central striker are defending the other team, you must go to help get the ball played if the team ordered attacks should always be the first choice happens, the easier, more ease and less risk, if the computer attacks have broken long carte blanche to launch high passes that cross lines. The todocampista is for everything.
When we analyzed the individual qualities of the mediofensivos we put the emphasis on goals and assists, marking the team, when we analyzed the midfielders as we put the accent in the record in the alignments and the team concede. Analyze the individual qualities of todocampista should mix of both. Their contribution to the attack will be of higher quality if your team scores more goals and their contribution to defense will be better with fewer clicks, so that a ratio that divides the goals scored by the embedded give us a good idea of \u200b\u200bthe contribution to the balance of team our player. But here there is an arithmetic trap: ultra-defensive teams with poor figures scorers may give ratios similar to sweeping equipment with few defensive concerns. And sometimes both sides are far apart in the standings What should be the tiebreaker? Relativizing these figures with those of the champions league the last few years. Thus, only if the number of goals scored is really high or if the goals-against is really low, the ratio will be high.
But we must not let our hero fully diluted in the team's results. Will rescue the individual ratio midfielders positive notion of ownership but without taking into account the card numbers. Unlike those, the todocampista is a piece that many items have changed on the fly, so his versatility, quality, balance, would secure ownership. And as for the cards, the todocampista not typically obligated to make faults rather than soft tactics because he knows that there are two lines of defense to stop the top-ranked rival.
The Individual would thus be Ratio:
As happened with the midfielders, it is necessary to correct the ratio to the shares of the player the entitlements to be implicit in it. A simple look at the ratio can be easily deduced that this tends to 1 when the player gets closer to excellence.
COLLECTIVE VARIANT
As noted earlier, almost exclusive of todocampista valuable quality is the balance and individual level is well reflected by the balance between goals scored, goals conceded and entitlements. So how do you assess the collective level a player who even in their individual assessment is measured by the overall performance? Then going over to there, the team aspect finalist, you get points. Because they can score lots of goals and fit very few, if key parties in the team does not win or lose the success will not be reached. In all these tests we put the emphasis on relevance: In the context of a game all circumstances mediate the game are, for the immediate, the end of the game itself is the goal (mark or avoid). Similarly, in the context of a championship, goals scored or conceded are consequential, here the immediate, definite, is points.
both collective assessment as the midfielder mediofensivo resorted to the ratio of points scored to assess the contribution the player's team. Here we will do the same.
mediofensivo In case you enriched the contribution data with the goals of the player (although not essential attribute values) that was relativized by the goals conceded by the team (a sign that the player did not assume this task with risky). In the case of midfield made him rich relativizing his contribution in goals and assists (equally valuable but not required) to the best asistidor data (a reference scale moderately affordable). In the case of todocampista, build a ratio where the proportion of points is implicit but we positively contribute to the numerator figures for goals and assists the player with the idea of \u200b\u200braising its valuation when, in addition to the team involved achieve its best figures of points, then directly adding goals and assists. Thus the difference between the salience and excellence is given by the sum of the visible to invisible. The
Ratio Collective look like this:
Players which belonged to top teams have a ratio close to 0.8-0.9, but if they are also decisively participatory pieces may bring the ratio to 1.
the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR
When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed each of them to ensure that the overall result is not suffering the overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant would be:
RG = IR x CR x 100
As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.
OBJECT MATHEMATICS
While the process continued to produce a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from a certain imbalance due to the multiplicative nature factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:
2 ___
RF = \\ / RG
HISTORICAL OBJECT
This is the end of the process.
As we have relied upon the collective achievements of the team and the player's presence through the entitlements, we will apply the ratio to the average of the sum total of points, title and player of the last five years. Ultimately only the best midfield players are regulars who also will earn many points for their teams.
0 comments:
Post a Comment