What Is This Song That Counts Down From 10 9 8 7

ATTACKER TOP European leagues MULTIPURPOSE

STANDARDS FOR THE SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT

Can you evaluate each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of a versatile attacker? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. An attacker can trigger 4 times in a game, including 2 bow and 2 remote viewing outside. Of the latter one was sent out by the rejection of a defense, so that was the fault of the front and another not. He also tried to uncheck several passes being intercepted all by the opposing defense at least two, of which one was spoiled by the front and one ended in record attendance Could it? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 shots that go out some fault of the attacker and not others, that for every 100 passes, some will be caught and others do not.

Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure to 90% coincide with the full weight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are:
-Goals-Goals
player of his team
-Goals of the top scorers of the 5 major leagues
-Goals of the championship teams of the same league
-Shots on goal totals and player-Assists

-Average Player of the best asistidor of the 5 most powerful leagues.
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 5 years, which seems a very appropriate time slice to evaluate football careers, as most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4.
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: First, second and subsequent goals, number of assigned counsel in their marking, quality associates, quality of the opposition, and so on. But all of them together would amount to no relevance to those described above and 6 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions.
not intended here as an exhaustive analysis, but a relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.

THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION

Is there really versatile attacker's figure? Probably, if we rely on team tactics distribution would have to say no, there is no Balompédica chess piece to which we can call as if the versatile attacker must be called goalie, center, or end. And the truth is we all have in mind a present or past players that when they have been the best of his era, have quickly been considered as the best ever.
all starts with a very skilled forward with the ball at his feet, or a goal or end with a lot of offensive half with much overflow and technical resources. When you are young or inexperienced coaches put them in tip or band or the edge of the box to display the characteristics that have been storing up in their training. But quickly become the tactical problem, because it turns out they put more goals than the striker himself or giving more assistance to the most creative midfielder or overflow team inside or outside more consistently than any ends of the template. This is when the coach realizes he has a special player at hand and that henceforth the most advanced positions 3-4 of the team should be linked to the movements of its most complete attacker Why prevent firing if scores more goals? Why not give him the handle of the game if you are able to provide assistance so prolific? Why not forgive turnovers if not lost when the team scores?
The player who reaches such consideration enjoys carte blanche particular he regularly demonstrated his decisive nature, so that individual effects are valued more for their efficiency for their efficiency. His prestige in the group ensures a collective patience, eventually, helps your productivity. And productivity are football goals and assists. The pass rates, recoveries, the effectiveness of face-to-door does not go with them. In these items, obviously, there are more and less efficient, but if the attacker gets 25 goals with 10% accuracy will be better appreciated if 20 hits with 15% or 15 to 20%.
Football is the only sport where 0 may therefore be a good result and where 1 can be decisive. In more than half of game time and no time is left over to patch that effectively allow an attacker to do as long as it fulfills its part of the deal: Being the attacker more crucial.
Therefore when assessing the player's individual skills mean we will draw its goals and assists in 35 games and relativize the averages of the top scorers and asistidor. In this ratio exceeded 1 round or is a sign of excellence.
Therefore, the Individual would thus be Ratio:

THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE

However, the effectiveness of the attacker that will assure a certain primacy tactic does not mean it can not be estimated ( and it is) the effect their actions can have on the collective.
As offensive players are defensive responsibility is very limited and will come marked more by tactical team available. If a good attacker gets 20 goals and 10 assists gives it much more profitable to give freedom and build a defensive system consisting of specialists behind him to force him to take on defensive duties in the end, they are rarely decisive. The ability to press or hold an attacker is a quality offensive (because it encourages moves goal) to defensive (with three lines behind the contest may be valuable but essential). Returning to the concept of profitability, it is preferable the attacker to steal only 1 in 10 balls and this ends in a goal to rob on October 8 and assume that only recover possession. In developing a game is a tactical action only fully finalist and immediate goal. The rest are merely means to that end.
Therefore, when its contribution to the goal is not direct (marking or attending) there is only one way to assess their contribution to the set: The goals scored by his teammates. If we have two strikers with similar numbers equivalent teams playing in one of them will be better off than their peers mess gets more goals. How to do it (pressing to retrieve balls, combined with their peers, providing passing lanes, accumulating defensive help rivals, causing errors ...) is relatively indifferent. The important thing is the result. And the results are optimal goals. Yes
worth noting the number of shots on goal. Whether or not a goal, and as we said before, here is valued more than efficiency and effectiveness is therefore desirable that the shots that make the attacker, whether many or few, go to door, because the reject or punt the porter plays second lead that ultimately increase the overall offensive flow. When valorábamos before computation of goals scored by his team were leaving the attacker to the mercy of their peers, enter the number of shots on goal that data qualifies therefore be exploited or not for the rest, the player has provided second plays. To do so relativize the shots on goal average of the top scorers.
Therefore, the first factor will add goals from their peers and relativize the number of goals scored by the champions of the major leagues and on the second divide ratio computation of shots on goal by shooting the bow of top scorers.
The collective ratio looks like this:










However, the second ratio could artificially inflate the collective value of a player in those cases in which the striker dispute a sufficiently high number parties and militates in a particular team scorer. To avoid adding a correction factor to the rest of the team goals and team shots on goal due (in terms of actual games played), which will build the desirable 35 games per season:
Cor = Matches / ( 35 x 5)

The final Collective would thus be Ratio:

the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR

When handling items added weight must each of them to ensure that the overall result is not This suffers from the overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of data calculation significant would be:

RG = IR x CR x 100

As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.

OBJECT MATHEMATICS

While the process continued to produce a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from a certain imbalance due to the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Statistics specification provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:

2 ___
RF = \\ / RG


HISTORICAL OBJECT

This is the end of the process. We released a ratio that combines the best qualities inherent individual and collective a versatile attacker, but this is a reflection of their quality potential, not its historical significance. The story does not pass the best players, but those who do it best. And if a versatile attacker, besides being very good, has been steadfast in its contribution in goals and assists to his team during a long period of time, reach significance for posterity. So the end result will leave the ratio multiple of the amount of goals and assists during the period.