STANDARDS IN SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT
Can evaluate all each of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of a down payment? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information is not so much the most comprehensive, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. A coupling can send 4 balls in a game area, 2 of which are topped and 2 no. Of the latter one was sent at a low height, the other was in top condition but no companion went to the auction. Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that in 100 balls to the area not finished off some fault of the down payment and no, that influences the opposing defense some and not others.
Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% coincide with the full weight . And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but the first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are:
-Assists Player
-Goals from player-
Goals
team -Goals of the championship teams of the same league
-Shooting and shots on goal total player
-Goals together by his team-Equity
player
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate fraction of the time to evaluate football career, as most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4.
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 7 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions.
here is not intended as an exhaustive analysis, but relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.
THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
Like the end, the lock position of the toes, false front (all these names and some another is given) is not a fixed part in the usual tactical systems. Teams like Barcelona so successful for decades without even having to use even counted in their ranks with some of the best catches available. And the Catalan club is not unique. However, when the fans spontaneously develops an list of top offensive players remember it usually appears in one or more hooks popularity. Why a position that gives the football players so remarkable is not as fixed as others? The key is in the hoax.
Hitch, as with the versatile attacker is a player who is ejected from its original position, but unlike what happens with that, they migrate to positions closer to the goal as promotion due to its easy for the goal (we saw that the best versatile attacking even more goals put the delanterocentros), it does so not fully adequate to its previous position.
Sometimes it is an attacking midfielder whose ability to control the game your team is diluted to his lair to step on the field. If the hook is quality, that progression will lead to less control of the ball, but will result in more goals and assists. As with the goal in front partner / attacker versatile, good catches are breathtaking ease to give assistance, even over the best half-offensive ... tread area if, of course. Eventually puts them one second behind midfield and given that freedom. Examples of this mutation we have players like Kaka, Van der Vaart or Gourcuff.
Sometimes the hook reaches its position after having developed his evolution from youth football as a striker. But it often happens that a speed and scale in these categories allows you to be a dangerous point, to get to professional football are revealed as inadequate and the player, whether it is technically good, will mutate to the position of second striker, which achieved to be common , and ultimately the sum of goals and assists per season does not vary much from the sum of goals from striker successful. This could prove the case of Benzema, as it was that of his countryman Anelka, or has finished the last going Kanoute or Cassano, the penultimate example of the long legions of Trequartista so abundant in Italian football.
In other cases, progression to the second line player in the area is done from the band. Also, speed and dribble in youth categories will be an extremely destabilizing allow you to become mediocre at professional level. In this third case is again the technical quality of player that allows a player to become more focused and collective. This would be the case Özil or Silva.
The common denominator, as we see is always the same: A player is technically very good as steps on the "no man's land, seizes it. So hitch that is not fixed part if I can be the striker or the side, but, as also happened with the versatile attacker, is invented to take advantage of special technical qualities of a player who already available. Certainly there are teams that usually play with this hitch over the years, but is often the case that players whose chips tactic migration process was already completed in his home club.
When valued part of the same basis as the versatile attacker, their numbers of goals and assists, but under a different approach, because although these, for its productivity and efficiency than just setting the whole environment based on offensive them, change the locks on the collective level must justify their presence in the field. The versatile attacker may act as a center forward, as an end or as a down payment, because its versatility and productivity have to keep it in the field. Hitch instead take its own position only if justified in terms of results, mostly offensive. If the technician will set to introduce another striker or another midfielder. Ultimately the assessment of coupling efficiency and effectiveness are combined.
When we draw the ratio will approach the individual contribution from three directions. First, the number of team goals. If the player on the field the team scores more goals than others, the player makes a positive contribution. The second is the sum of goals and assists the player, because if your numbers are high, their participation will be more profitable than other tactical changes also raise the final number of goals. The third is the participation in terms of percentage of these figures for goals and assists for the higher such participation, the clearer will be the dependence of their team's offense clicks. To relativize this triple sum (which in itself carries a triple assessment of its net contribution), we use the number of goals a season of major league champions.
The Individual would thus be Ratio:
As happened in other ratios introduce a correction factor related with the number of matches played by the player, making 35 the maximum desirable. Likewise, the denominator will be extended to the 5-year study
Cor = Matches Played / 35
So that would finally and Individual Ratio:
players from top teams this ratio will touch or exceed 1, but exceptionally productive players who accumulate a lot of very competitive teams entitlements in this ratio was closer to 2 than to 1.
THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE
Again a comparison with the end is irrelevant. As it happens to the position of the hitch in the field not only justified by their productivity offensive, but for tactical cost. As it is not obligatory to play with one on the court, the coach will assess removed if their productivity despite the team charged with overexertion in the middle of the field that requires many coverages, or comings and goings as a result of the contras prompted by turnovers. The neck must be bold in their statements, must take the initiative to cause breaks in the marking and scoring plays, but he will know how to take the initiative for a potential error does not cause a dangerous against. A sign that the hook does not fit well to team play is when the team gives the impression of being cut in half despite playing with 2-3 midfielders. That impression of rupture usually occurs when the core players are forced by these cons to be closer to the goal itself to the contrary, either because repeated turnovers ends and / or hooks, or by precipitation of the latter at the time of raising new offensive action before the team is again reset.
When calibrating these situations, we assess directly the number of shots the player, having previously estimated the effectiveness of face-to-door or pass individual trait goal, now compete to justify their position from the perspective of their collective game contest has to be explained by the activity of face-to-door: If you are in the field and not shoot, why would it be? Implicitly evaluate its effectiveness for the calculation taking only shots on goal. Also intuit its tactical cost in terms of goals conceded by the team, which will be valued inversely, and which they will add the number of shootings that have not been on goal.
Just as the Individual Ratio proceed to the correction of this ratio through the units, so that the collective Ratio shall read as follows:
The range of variation of this ratio will be sharper, but usually has to be closer to 1 than 0 or natural numbers high.
the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR
When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed each of them to ensure that the overall result is not suffering from overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant data would be:
RG = RI x RC x 100
As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, was added to 100 so that the resulting figure is a number easier to retain.
OBJECT MATHEMATICS
While the process continued to produce a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from some imbalance due to the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:
2 ___
RF = \\ / RG
A historical objections
Here is the end of the process.
The resulting ratio will give us a figure broadly assess the qualities of a hook to be a key piece of equipment that contribute to their goals and assists the collective success, but endorsement of all its alignment will be marked by repeated and direct contributions over time. Not enough to be a good hook potential, it must be notice in the historical record.
therefore apply this ratio to the average of one hand the amount of goals and assists for other entitlements to the team.
0 comments:
Post a Comment