STANDARDS FOR THE SEARCH OF SIGNIFICANT
Can you evaluate each and every one of the circumstances that exist in a field to evaluate the quality of the side? The answer is neither yes nor no, the answer is for what. According to what we have seen in the cost analysis of relevant information not so much the more comprehensive information, but one that is meaningful and accessible at once. One side goes to court on 12 plays, of which recovers the ball in 7, and 5 can ignore the player, but the latter, in 3 gets slow progression of attacking midfielder with which the central or porter carries out its work to advantage. On the climbs, has crashed 7 times the area 5, one of them at the foot of the attacker and another 4 has resulted in a rebound to a teammate may have a shot at goal advantage. Could you record this? Of course, but getting to that point of detail involves spending hours and hours to get a story that, ultimately, may not be as important. It is more reasonable from our perspective to assume that for every 100 hang ups sometimes the ball and some not, some go by foot or head of the companion and not others, that some foster second play, sometimes not, and is the overall balance that we provides the most definitive.
Suppose we want to calculate the weight of a human body if we put in the balance the skin, bones, muscles, viscera, fat and blood we will have a figure, 90% match with full weight. And the tendons, and nerves, and mucous membranes, and bronchi, y. ..? Dozens of other elements have weight, but first 6 and gave us information relevant enough to be able to abstract the rest (obvious or estimated from those).
The list of the data I used to develop standards are
Player-Goals-Goals conceded by his team-
Goals conceded by the champions of major league player
-Assists
-matches of his team
player-Shooting-
Yellow and red cards, fouls committed by the player
All these data are handled in a time perspective of the past 4-5 years, which seems a very appropriate fraction of time to evaluate football career because most professionals working in about 3 decades, sometimes 2, sometimes 4.
Are there other data that they can grab to complete the calculations? No doubt! Hundreds of them actually: dodges attempted and made, received and warnings caused errors, turnovers, as companions, as rivals, and so on. But not all of them together would add the importance of those written before and 8 would change the analysis very cumbersome. It is more efficient to consider that either are not as significant, or are circumstances that eventually become compensated in some other occasions.
not intended here as an exhaustive analysis, but relevant analysis, which may be questionable but not contentious.
THE INDIVIDUAL VARIATION
Given its dynamism required, the side is, with the midfield, the player with more simultaneous participation in attack and defense. It is primarily a defender, and he appreciates that do their job to counter the opponent with the greatest efficiency possible, but the best side, those who are raffled most powerful clubs, are also to comply with the defensively provide substance to the offensive game.
Your uploaded by band, often with the ball at his feet, causing a mismatch natural tactical as not all teams play with pure extreme enough for them to follow the simple slogan to pair up where necessary. On the contrary, when the side the ascent is under pressure from media offensive, midfield and ultimately from the rival side, the only opposing player who inhabits the same plot. At the same time, have a good side winger means that his team will have to provide tactical measures to prevent the contras prompted by the large lateral space that is left behind. The most common is the alternation of increases to the other side (to allow the entire defense tilt slightly toward the gap) combined with the careful help of the midfield, which tends to close the road leakage of this increase.
When evaluating their individual qualities take into account the well-known maxim that the best attacking side as the best end and defended as the best central. Thus, we use both elements of the ratio to assess the dual quality.
Up in the numerator, we assess the player's offensive contribution, adding shots on goal and assists, and desirable ultimate goal of any increase that price. We take as a given the shot on goal instead of scoring, because the side firing positions tend to be less advantageous, and the mere fact that culminates with a rising shot into the net that may lead to the goal or a second move, and this price increase makes it useful.
Down in the denominator, the cost of these increases tactical measures the amount of goals conceded and red cards equivalent (ie accounting for 1 per 5 yellow red). A good side, do what you do above, must meet below, and as far as possible in the most clean. Since
figures on goal, assists, cards are absolute and final, we will apply the correction factor
Cor = Matches / 35x5
relativize the contribution to the side to concede to avoid penalizing the team in excess of those players who have lost a substantial number of matches.
THE ALTERNATIVE COLLECTIVE
As already mentioned, the side that happens is that the midfield and being a defensive player, he is expected to attack. Therefore when assessing their collective contribution is to be understood that unlike what happens with the center (whose contribution is indispensable defensive), its influence on the balance of the team is estimable, but not the style of a midfielder, where valorábamos the proportion of points awarded to infer that balance, but a proper way, they repeat the mixed (edge \u200b\u200b+ defender) on the side. We therefore propose a first ratio where the number of rooms the number of wins the team to what we will add the always estimable contribution goals, and the denominator the number of defeats, to which we will apply the usual correction factor. Thus the first ratio gives an idea of \u200b\u200bwhether the input side is estimable: The more involved, more wins, fewer losses.
At the same time will multiply by a second ratio that takes into account directly the total number of errors received and conversely the number of fouls committed. A high number here leads us to believe that the smooth side measures although their increases, which causes dangerous faults which forces to stop it and that increases their bullying stops rivals thrive without the misconduct.
The Collective would thus be Ratio:
the summit of RELEVANCY: THE GLOBAL FACTOR
When dealing with elements that are added must be weighed for each ensure that the overall result is not suffering from overvaluation of one of its components. Not so when the issue is to use factors. Caution about it if we understand that a striker is better the higher the RI and RC, taken independently, the multiple of both grows with each one of them.
We have by convention that even in the case of the most selfish players on the collective factor has to be equally significant to the individual, but each one can weigh each of them as you deem appropriate.
Thus the resulting overall ratio, the rating of how important the quality of a forward both individually and collectively on the basis of calculating the most significant would be:
RG = IR x CR x 100
As a multiple of amounts less than 1.0 usually yield very small numbers, has added 100 so that the resulting number is a number easier to retain.
MATHEMATICS OBJECT
While all the proceedings produced a relevant and efficient ratio based on information brief but highly significant, the end result suffers from a certain imbalance due to the multiplicative nature of the factors. The order of the final results may seem consistent, but not differences in size.
Descriptive statistics provides us with a simple tool to adjust these deviations, which is the geometric mean. While the arithmetic mean is the average of N numbers by dividing the total combined N, the arithmetic mean is an average of quantities multiplied, but not the average ratio is used (which would have relevance proportional), but the square root, or if the root N.
The final ratio would therefore like this:
2 ___
RF = \\ / RG
OBJECT HISTORICAL Here
the end of the process.
All aspects of the qualities of the side have been taken into account to determine a ratio that gives us the value of the side, but find a figure that speaks to us of the importance of effective over a period apply a multiplier determined what the result of adding to their entitlements during the period the number of assists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment